The most basic solution would be a SSH reverse tunnel to a VPS outside. Have a machine in your network establish that tunnel and set it to reconnect automatically. Now you can SSH into one box of your network. If the router acts up and factory resets (as long as it reestablishes the connection), you can SSH back into your network and reconfigure everything from there.
I can only draw from my French, but I guess “no to war” is the correct translation, as “no to the war” in English would be either wonky or would mean “no to this specific war”. But the Spanish wording is more read as “no to war in general”, so the translation is more correct.
It’s a legal thing. No (real) jurisdiction. In space nobody will shut down Grok generating kiddo porn. It’s basically the precursor for Epstein Island 2.0.
Lifting half a ton…for how long?
But it does depend
No. Here’s the funny thing: having human rights depends on nothing! That is what makes them ‘universal’ and ‘inalienable’.
chance at attaining asylum when they committing the crimes
Again not how human rights work. I’m pretty sure that even the state has better reasoning for the deports than you, as this would be such a blatant violation of human rights, that it would be very awkward for Germany.
go so far to defend literal rapists
You made that allegation often in this thread. But you do realize that defending the individual and their deed is very different from defending their rights? All those ‘Western’ and ‘Christian’ values? Here we could really show them and fill those words with meaning. Having values and standing for them becomes hard, when you have to apply them to rapists, yes. But that’s also the test, whether you’re serious about those grandiose values.
It is very complicated.
commits a serious crime -> their asylum case is no longer valid
If their asylum case is dismissed because of crimes, that would be a direct violation of human rights. The right to asylum does not depend on whether you’re a nice or very shitty person.
They almost carry out their sentence in Germany
So in the eyes of the law they’re redeemed and attoned? How is their crime then relevant in the legal discussion about deportation? You, personally, can still hate them for their crimes, the state cannot. So it’s back to “do they have a reason for asylum?”. I’d say yes, very much, it’s an easy case for Afghanistan.
How do you know they were in Germany illegaly, anyway? The article does not state that?
What is it now? Are they deported because they’re illegal or because the are “convicted of heinous crimes (drug trafficking and rape)”, as you wrote before?
And if they’re “only illegal”: how can they not be qualified for an asylum case, if their country tortures and murders political opponents?
Edit: and if they’re criminals, but are deported because they’re illegal: where’s the justice in that? The law states 6 months to 5 years minimum for different acts of rape, for example. So they get a free pass now, because they’re of another nationality? Society deems that the proper punishment for rape, apparently, so why are they not punished accordingly, then? And our juidical system thinks of people who served their sentence as redeemed, so after their sentence they could qualify for asylum again, as maybe Afghanistan is still unsafe then, but they’re redeemed?!
got convicted in courts
Last I checked being deported was no penalty in German criminal code.
So those literal rapists and drug traffickers walk free in Afghanistan?
Mission accomplished, such dramatic charges, much wow.
Makes sense. Occupy a country to bring freedom and democracy™, fail horribly, kill a lot of people while at it and in the end deport more people to be killed and tortured 👍
Mission accomplished!
Correlation, causation, and such. Anectotal: know a well educated (i.e. intelligent) family, one child dumb as fuck.
What the “intelligent parents” bring to tme table: often money, but generally resources to educate the children. Send them to better schools, fund a college education, be capable of helping them with homework, enabling their outer curriculum activities.
That’s all stuff that society could provide for parents who can’t, but society doesn’t. Thus, statistically as you wrote,
with the occasional outliers.
Open Office =/= Libre Office
The latter is a long standing fork of the former and considered the “FLOSS standard office suite”. It has a “modern” ribbon UI, but you have to set it like that, it usually comes with the “old layout” by default.
OnlyOffice is another office suite which brings a ribbon UI by default.
While not open source Softmaker Office mimics Microsoft Office the closest (and claims the best available MS file format compatibility, but I cannot say anything about that).
If the old EU only comprises of Hungary, the new EU would get just the same trade deals within a day, I reckon.
If you can’t get rid of a EU member all other members need to quit the EU and found a new one, without said member 🤔
Ah, that clears up your misundestanding. You misinterpret the second paragraph in Article 14.
The second point of Article 14 is not about “you lose your right to asylum if you perpetrate a crime”. It is about “you cannot claim asylum for the prosecution of a crime”. So if they were e.g. commiting murder in Afghanistan, fled from there and claimed asylum in Germany, because they were prosecuted in Afghanistan for said murder, they had no right to asylum.