• Avicenna@programming.dev
    11·
    6 days ago

    Yeah Elon no matter what you do, the geek/nerd crowd (that you imagine yourself to be a part of) will always hate you. You are stuck with toxic tech bros and racist pedophiles (including your daddy) for life. Enjoy.

  • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
    16·
    7 days ago

    That’s a pretty cool thing to do. But it’s disingenuous how he goes “don’t trust anything that isn’t open source” after having operated multiple businesses based on closed-source software for years. Wonder if he will also open up the code for Teslas…

  • buran@lemmy.todayEnglish
    16·
    7 days ago

    I’m pretty sure only the frontend will release but no server code will be released.

  • fox2263@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    6 days ago

    Funny if it’s the frontend style framework only. Presuming it’s not “twitter bootstrap” anymore 🤣

  • amio@lemmy.world
    97·
    8 days ago

    So the only thing you can confidently say based on this information is: it’s 100% certain the entire codebase of Twitter will not be going open source.

    • gankouskhan@piefed.zipEnglish
      11·
      8 days ago

      Maybe the entire frontend so they can train on copyrighted data without punishment. Grok has been sassy with daddy and he is angry.

  • artyom@piefed.socialEnglish
    61·
    8 days ago

    Let’s add it to the list of lies:

    • musk is a “free speech absolutist”
    • FSD next year!
    • E2EE chats in Xitter

    Keep it going!

  • one_old_coder@piefed.socialEnglish
    382·
    8 days ago

    If it’s not a lie, it’s not worth it anyway, we have better things now. I do love the boot lickers who want to help him though.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      29·
      8 days ago

      This just a ploy to feed Grok.

      Also their code isn’t valuable. I want to see the algorithms and admins logs and bots.

        • adarza@lemmy.caEnglish
          10·
          8 days ago

          this is the idiot that took down twitter when he yeeted racks out of a data center and threw 'em into a u-haul… ones that were still powered on and used by the site. so anything’s possible… but i don’t think even he would be so stupid as to release the algorithms or his special ‘tweaks’ to them.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.ukEnglish
      3·
      7 days ago

      It could be to crowd sourced bug fixes. I’m sure someone will be keen to give daddy musk all the help he needs.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    14·
    7 days ago

    The uber-rich are jumping onto the opensource bandwagon due to the hype. Just wait. They don’t understand a thing about the philosophy but “free”. Free labor, free publicity, and a better public image for free.

        • viral.vegabond@piefed.socialEnglish
          2·
          6 days ago

          Yes, Mastodon uses the activitypub protocol. That is basically my point, that we already have a ‘federated twitter.’ So, unless I’m missing something, what would be the point of forking and adding activitypub to twitter when we already have the better version in Mastodon?

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
            2·
            6 days ago

            I think their point was so that the fediverse people could also see Twitter posts and vice versa, which I guess some people would like, but some would block.

            One of the complaints that people have about the Fedverse is that you’re never exactly sure which instances interoperate with which other ones, and so somebody that other people are talking to might be blocked on your instance, and you might think, this fediverse sucks.

            But honestly I think this is necessary for instance sovereignty and safety, so maybe people will get used to it.

            • viral.vegabond@piefed.socialEnglish
              2·
              6 days ago

              I do think that people will probably get used to that aspect of the fediverse.

              About the twitter bridge, I see your point. It wouldn’t be twitter anymore though, it would be the [federated fork name] of twitter which would have to co-opt the current userbase which kind of again leads to the whole why not Mastodon already instead?

              • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                1·
                6 days ago

                The way I interpreted it was if Twitter made their codebase open source, then people could submit pull requests that would add AP federation, and have them merged. But there’s surely room for different interpretations of the original comment.

                • viral.vegabond@piefed.socialEnglish
                  2·
                  5 days ago

                  While I appreciate what you’re saying, I don’t really think the original comment we were discussing was open for interpretation. It was pretty specific about ‘…fork it and add[ing] activitypub integration.’

                  That being said, I do think it’s an interesting thought and I hadn’t really considered pull requests to the original code base to add AP. I feel like the likelihood of that actually happening are probably pretty slim though. Would be curious to hear what other people thought about that possibility too.

      • nagaram@piefed.socialEnglish
        5·
        7 days ago

        I mean, I use GoToSocial, people like Sharkey or Akkoma.

        Who knows, maybe someone would prefer twitter for some reason.

        Plain old Mastodon does seem the better option though