Please note this does not mean the USSR wasn’t that way. Just want to clarify I’m not a tankie, lol.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The largest population of Marshallese people in the continental United States is in Springdale, Arkansas, just a short drive from where I live.

    Why is there a large Marshallese population in Arkansas?

    Well, you see, between 1946 - 1958, the US government detonated sixty-seven (yes, 67) nuclear weapons on the Marshall Islands, rendering dozens of the islands uninhabitable.

    I suppose you could call it a “big whoops” except for the part a where they were fully aware of the dangers of radioactive fallout and just did it anyway.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Isn’t the US Air Force still missing like 5 bikes that they lost over the decades?

    I could go over mk ultra and other fun little government projects but I guess people already got the point

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If Chernobyl had almost exploded and melted down, I wouldn’t blame the USSR for trying to hide it.

    • starik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yes. And when it did explode, they should have prioritized saving lives rather than preserving national reputation.

      Disasters happen. How they are handled is what matters, and on that front, there was a difference between the two sides of the Cold War.

  • forrgott@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Half my immediate family has cancer from undisclosed testing causing nuclear fallout over swaths of the southwest US…

    US is run by assholes.

      • forrgott@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well, sorta. Most of us fail to participate at all in voting, mainly cause we know the system is fucked and nigh impossible to “fix from within”, but also have no clear idea what could be done. Other than the obvious, but not many are eager to face death, obviously…

    • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Haha, my goal in life is to be called either an opossum lady or a bat lady. Smashing success!

  • slemptastrophe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You know how you hear stories sometimes about shadowy government agencies converging on an area for no apparent reason, and then leaving just as fast as they came? People usually assume it’s aliens, but I wonder how many of those incidents have been stupid shit like this.

    • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Probably all of those, because it’s really unlikely that aliens have come to earth and even less likely that an advanced civilization capable of interstellar travel, would ever get busted.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Military term for this is “broken arrow”

      It happens more than you would think mostly by the US but also Russia. Usually they find the things pretty fast but a few are just missing and at least one I remember was underwater somewhere it couldn’t safely be recovered so the area is patrolled.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think one of these armed hydrogen bombs they dropped on NC was never recovered. Someone said that online I didn’t read it in a publication so idk.

      But there was an incident in Portugal, they sent in these service members to clean up this wreckage with no safety gear and they all died of cancer and the government denied it all. Also plutonium I believe.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If I recall, Chernobyl wasn’t actually a nuclear meltdown or explosion. It was a pressure vessel explosion.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You are correct, it was a rapid increase in heat that blew the lid and spread radioactive material everywhere, but the was no nuclear detonation.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Coolant flow stopped and they pushed the rods in rather than out, compounding the heat buildup. It was a pressure cooker explosion, followed by fissile material melting. It didn’t melt down on its own, it was guided.

    • Rato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Was not a nuclear explosion, sure, reactors can’t really explode in the same way as bombs, but it absolutely was a meltdown. Meltdown really just means that the fuel melted, which did happen shortly after the power peak flashed the coolant to steam and blew open the core.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yep, just to add, it’s entirely possible to have a melt down without any explosion at all. As you said, It just means the fuel melted through the reactor vessel. It can even happen without the fuel going prompt-critical.

  • voiceofchris @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For us not to qualify as a backwards ass country we’d also have to pretend that three mile island wasn’t one lucky accident away from doing just what Chernobyl did.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That explains so much about North Carolina.

    ~ngl, sometimes I kinda wish they had exploded a little bit.~

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Feels like every time I end up in North Carolina or meet someone from there my conviction that humans are not inherently good or evil is challenged. I fucking hate North Carolina, with cause. It’s as if the turd rival team full of bullies in a sports movie was a state.

      At least Mississippi and Alabama have the excuse of being economically depressed. And the people I’ve meet from those places are actually pleasant.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        As a near-lifelong resident of the GrEaT state of North Carolina, you are spot on in your assessment.

        • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Asking as a non-Southerner, what the hell is up with White people from the South? I keep hearing all about how great their hospitality is, but they’ve been (at least the most “Howdy, y’all” good old boys and belles) just culturally the most conniving and backstabbing petty Mean Girls. They’ll act sweet to your face, but you don’t even have to leave earshot before they start talking shit and starting small-town rumors. What, is it some kinda local pastime to start shit without saying it to somebody’s face?

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I wish I had an answer that would satisfy you. I am only realizing the depths of what you describe myself, and only because I am dating a woman from New Jersey. She is telling me all the time how culturally weird I am for how I act and talk to people (in general; I personally try my best to be authentic in my interactions).

    • PhoenixDog@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There’s absolutely nothing wrong with North Carolina.

      As long as you exclude North Carolina.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I know, I mean who hasn’t wanted to nuke North Carolina a little bit?

      I joke, it’s actually pretty cool in the mountains.

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Continuing…

      The other bomb did not get as far into its firing sequence, but became deeply embedded in a muddy field, and one of its major weapons components (the thermonuclear “secondary” stage) was regarded as irrecoverably lost after an extensive, failed effort to recover it.

      Me: “IT’S STILL THERE?!?!”

      Continuing…

      In 1962, the landowner was paid $1,000 to grant the United States of America a perpetual 200-foot (61 m) radius circular easement over the remains of the buried second bomb.[56][57] The site of the easement, at 35°29′37″N 77°51′30″W, is visible as a disturbed area, and lies approximately 250 feet (76 m) north of an obvious circle of trees (and disused cemetery) in the middle of a plowed field visible on Google Earth.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        $1,000 to grant the United States of America a perpetual 200-foot (61 m) radius circular easement

        worst deal than selling Manhattan for some beeds.

      • VictorPrincipum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Thermonuclear secondary stages, A.K.A. the “Fusion” portion don’t detonate unless the first stage has been propperly ignited. While Lithium Deuteride (the second stage fusion fuel) is not safe to handle (corrosive and explodes on contact with water) it’s not going to cause a blast comparable to even a fision bomb.

    • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Holy shit, that close to Raleigh?! Most of the state would have been wiped off the map twice. Maybe parts of VA and/or SC!

      Edit: Apparently it would have only taken out a few cities. Hollywood is wrong again!

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Raleigh would have been fine. VA and SC would have heard the explosion but nothing worse. I checked it with a nuclear blast simulator. Even the Tsar Bomba would have killed less than 5% of the population of Raleigh.

        “260 times the yield of the Hiroshima bomb” sounds impressive, but most of that energy is wasted heating the nearby air rather than increasing the blast radius. This is why modern nuclear weapons use cluster munitions with smaller yields.

  • prettybunnys@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It would really only be comparable if they nuked north Carolina then tried to cover it up.

    It’s not shocking that the military keeps classified that sort of thing, they’d have been hard pressed to keep an actual nuclear detonation classified/hidden 🤷‍♂️

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      A near miss and a disaster are worlds apart in terms of consequence, but very close in terms of what went wrong.

      • prettybunnys@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Tbh the bomb exploding would be worse because you’d have the kinetic blast and death from that PLUS fallout (though on the east coast that fallout would likely be headed to Europe)

        They didn’t drop the bombs by accident, there was a plane crash, the plane broke apart and the bombs began arming themselves as part of the separation process, but didn’t detonate due to the failsafes.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          14 hours ago

          To be clear the failsafes barely did.

          Of the steps in this diagram the only one that prevented a nuclear detonation of the first bomb was the arming switch. In the swiss cheese model of accidents, out of 17 layers of protection, 16 failed. The safety mechanism that succeeded in this case had a history of failing because nuts in the plane could fall down and short the switch, arming the bomb unintentionally in flight.

          The pilots who bailed out were both arrested by base MPs for ‘stealing parachutes’ while trying to get to the base and warn about the unsafe condition of the crash site. It probably didn’t help that the first pilot to make it to base was black in NC in the 60s.

    • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Making a mistake with something intended to kill people vs making a mistake with something that provides a public good show different levels of intent. One of them was a city destroyer on purpose and the other was a city destroyer on accident.

      • prettybunnys@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        There was a plane crash. It wasn’t some “whoops we dropped ze bombs” situation.

        There were catastrophic failures but still failsafes prevented the disaster.

        These events aren’t comparable at all.

        Three mile island is much more comparable.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Um, there were actually several instances of “woops we dropped a bomb”.

          Until the invention of the ICBM, there were planes carrying nukes in the air 24/7.

          It’s only thanks to luck that none of them exploded, as the safety systems in place today were not added until the 60s when Kennedy learned how American nukes were being handled and freaked the fuck out about it all. Justifiably so.

          The Air Force had been in charge before that and fought relentlessly against adding any safety systems at all.

      • prettybunnys@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Three Mile Island is a perfect comparison.

        Partial meltdown. Not hidden. Handled.

        Reported to emergency officials effectively immediately.

        • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It wasn’t handled perfectly, but the level of incompetence wasn’t nearly on the same level. Venting the Xenon and dumping the tritium water wasn’t exactly advised without approval but people acted on their own to do them. By far the biggest mistake was the comment from the power company spokesperson that he doesn’t need to tell the public everything they do.

          • prettybunnys@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah, but the government came behind and made it happen.

            Three Mile Island should be held up as a “why we need regulation and government oversight” example IMO.

            The business wanted to save face, they were obligated to be more forthcoming by the state.

          • prettybunnys@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Yeah they also might have found Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster in the reactor but they could be hiding that too.

            • flandish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              my point is that I’m not all about knowing “the other side” covers shit up and then assuming “my side” is telling the truth.

              they all lie. about literally everything.