• ChadGPT2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Reminder to keep one of those window breaker hammers in your car.

    Also don’t buy cars from megalomaniacal nazis.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just to be clear so people don’t think they are protected when they’re not: those window strikers ONLY work if your car windows are TEMPERED glass. They are 100% useless on laminated glass. The Cybertruck’s “unbreakable Armor Glass” is laminated.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh, great, then when it catches fire, and you’re going to die a certain fiery death, you can use it to bash yourself in the head to death for buying a SwastiKKKar.

  • pau_hana@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    These horrific deaths and injuries are tragic. I see too many schadenfreude comments here approving of people dying just because they chose to drive a vehicle most people don’t like. If there is blame, it is not on the victims, but on Tesla and the regulators we trust to ensure minimum and obvious safety features.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Perhaps if we were just talking Teslas in general, but the cybertruck? I can’t imagine any non-assholes buying and driving those. That thing is a statement, a fascist “own-the-libs” statement in particular.

    • Jiral@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I disapprove the Schadenfreude comments, but this is not merely a “vehicle most people don’t like”. It is a dangerous vehicle unnecessarily threatening health and even live of other members of the community, especially of children. There is a reason why it is not street legal in the EU.

      • pau_hana@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I agree the EU regulators made the right call, and this vehicle should not be on the public streets anywhere until it can meet basic safety standards, both for the drivers and for the public.

    • TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anybody that bought a cyber truck did so knowing full well Elon is a Nazi. They made their bed and now they can lie in it. No compassion at all for these selfish fucks.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Anybody that bought a cyber truck did so knowing full well Elon is a Nazi.

        The cybertruck was available to buy before he went full mask off. And not everyone is “in-touch” with everything.

        No compassion at all

        Disgusting.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Felon Muskrat went full mask off way back in 2016 when he called child rescuers a Pedo.

            That wasn’t “mask off”, that was him being publicly petulant. That was him not knowing how to react to someone telling him “no”. It was the start of the cracks in his pubic veneer. Most rational people would say his reaction to that situation was ridiculous and childish, but I would bet there’s a good amount of people who still aren’t aware of what he said about the rescuers.

            His “mask off” moment was during the 2024 USA elections when he went full Nazi (openly).

            Granted, there were always indications for people who knew what to pay attention to, but that’s not most people.

          • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            informed consumer making rational decisions fallacy we have all been there. still, it hits different to mock them when they’re still alive to reflect on their choices

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      anyone that bought a cybertruck did so knowing full well that it’s a giant “fuck everybody but me” vehicle

      I have no sympathy for them. their victims, yes. the owner, not at all.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        anyone that bought a cybertruck did so knowing full well that it’s a giant “fuck everybody but me” vehicle

        That’s how many people see it, but I know a few people that are entirely disconnected from “celeb culture” and the news in general, and just think the cybertruck is neat technology. And to be fair, putting aside the massive safety issues with it, it does have noteworthy technology that on their own are interesting.

        And I think the cross section of people who are interested in the cybertruck, people who are not particularly intelligent, and who also have money are generally going to be the customer base. It’s fine to criticize, but to say “no sympathy” when they die is gross.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          sorry I should have added the alternative option of “is ignorant of the fact and should be expected to be able to figure that out”

          if somebody won’t think of how their actions affect others, fuck them.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sounds like a great way to fake your death. The only problem is that everyone will think you died driving a Tesla.

  • sploder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I can’t fathom having my husband burn to death so badly that he’s just … evaporated. But then again I can’t imagine my husband ever wanting a cybercuck so there’s also that.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    He says the trucks are “apocalypse-proof” and claims they can withstand bullets and have “armor glass” windows.

    They also withstand emergency responders and the occupant’s attempts to escape.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Chances of you experiencing the apocalypse - Zero

      Chances you will get trapped in an Cybercuck and be unable to get out - Not zero

    • arcine@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      He meant apocalypse proof from the INSIDE, duh ! If all hell breaks loose inside, it won’t get out, and neither will you !

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cremation is a new feature. It’ll be an extra $2500 and comes with a decision engine on whether you should live or die (door unlocking). Tesla knows, trust Elon.

    • ruan@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unluckly, choosing big cars with very strong/resistant materiais as daily driver means any recklessness that results in accidents involving other drivers are more letal for the smaller car.

      So choosing a cybertruck probably means you have better survival chances in crashes against smaller cars in general.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve taken a couple uber rides in a Tesla and I wish they’d give you the option to select NOT THAT. I just stared at the stupid door button the whole time

  • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The cybertruck actually burns so hot it destroys your soul. No afterlife for you!

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m not in any way trying to downplay how bad the cyber-dumpster is, but is that an adequate sample size to extrapolate the fiery-death rate? The article says 17 times the rate of the Pinto, but it was only 5 total fires.

            • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              5 days ago

              The biggest issue with the Pinto was not the Pinto itself, it was how Ford discussed the potential issues with it internally. It was their very well documented preference for money over protecting human life that caused the controversy.

              We know this really happens all the time, at all companies and in all industries, but Ford was punished for saying the quiet part out loud (amongst themselves) and getting caught doing it. We are all supposed to at least put on a show of human lives being more important than money, and Ford failed to put on the show, and for that they were punished.

              We still don’t care about human life, but at least we all felt better about it afterwards.

              • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                There’s an episode of Swindled all about how Ford knew this was a flaw and allowed it to happen so that they could compete in the lower end market.

            • Rimu@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 days ago

              huh, TIL. Thanks!

              So it’s just 17 times more likely to burn you to death than average cars.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      But maybe they have the lowest crash rate?
      So like, crashes cost money right? Someone is responsible. Someone has to pay.
      But if everyone dies in an inferno, then nobody is responsible. Who can pay? They’re all dead! What medical bills? What repairs? It’s all a write off.
      Sounds like a high mortality rate with low accident rate is an absolute profitable win! Free market baby!

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        According to the article they have higher crash rates and fatalities because the drivers are worse. The cars themselves actually rate fairly high in safety standards.

        That being said, I think the safety evaluations are flawed and don’t consider things like electronic locks.