• kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    thats so weird. if someone is forced to be on win7, no way they gonna change to linux. there has to be some compatibility issue in the background.

  • AgentBoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Windows 7 users are switching to forks that still support the OS, like r3dfox, Pale Moon, Mypal, and Supermium. Home users stuck with 7 and 8 probably won’t upgrade or try Linux, they didn’t even update to 10 for some reason (and it was free!) .

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not very techie, so when I took my brand new Lenovo (cheap) laptop from w11 to Linux mint, it really felt like an achievement. I haven’t used a command terminal since college, and I straight up made a bootable usb and wiped w11

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      At this point, if you have hardware, Linux is a good choice. New or old. The older it is might change which distro, but still a good choice.

  • hitstun@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The PC Gamer article’s title also says “upgrade or”. That’s a heck of a detail to editorialize out of the title.

    From the Mozilla post it cites:

    After this, no security updates will be provided and you are strongly encouraged to upgrade to a supported Microsoft Windows version.

    Or, if your current hardware can’t handle Windows 10 or higher for some reason, you can switch to a Linux-based operating system. The vast majority of Linux distributions come with Firefox as the default browser.

    I agree switching to Linux is the better option. I want to try Bazzite.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, Linux is an afterthought, but I’m glad that they brought it up at all. They could’ve mentioned how Linux is more privacy-conscious than Windows, but that might’ve opened them up to a lawsuit.

    • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Bazzite’s excellent, just be aware going in that it’s an immutible distro and some stuff may be different than you’re used to.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m still afraid to switch to Linux because I’ve used Windows since i was a kid with Windows 95. It’s gotten progressively worse, and I’m still reluctantly camped out on Windows 10, but the thought of firing up a new operating system and going back to being a confused adolescent who doesn’t know how to get around (with or without accidentally making an older woman crouching in red lingerie the desktop wallpaper on my family computer and then denying any knowledge of it) makes me really uneasy.

    Please, Linux whisperers. Calm my woes. 😓

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Linux is way more similar and familiar than you likely imagine.

      Of course, learning is inevitable going to Linux for the first time. But learning is not scary or bad. There are helpful docs and the community. Everyone here was once where you are now.

      Also, try Linux risk-free on Windows in a virtual machine.

      Next you can dual boot.

      Next, you can resort to running Windows apps via Wine and other virtual evironments.

      And only last but not least, can you go 100% pure Linux.

      So there is a gentle and gradual migration path available. It’s not an all or nothing commitment right upfront.

      You only have your chains to lose.

    • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You could do what I did: Install a second drive in your computer and install Linux (e.g. Linux Mint) on it. That way you can always go back to Windows should you come to the conclusion that Linux isn’t for you . But I have to say, being a recent switcher from Windows to Linux myself, the transition was really easier than I initially thought.

    • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve used Windows since i was a kid

      substitute “Windows” with “computer”. If you have any history of resolving “this doesn’t work for me” on your own (as opposed to waiting for someone else do to it for you), you will be fine. Just be sure not to jump into unknown when you have urgent important things to do :)

    • epicshepich@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Before Windows 11, I told people to switch to Linux because open source software is better for the soul. Now, I tell people because the user experience is just better. I used XP/Vista/7 throughout my childhood, and modern Linux desktop environments really do feel closer to that experience than Windows 11. I use Win11 for work, and I can confidently say that it has the worst settings menu I’ve ever used.

      If you know the basics of using a desktop computer, most things won’t feel that weird or foreign to you. The hardest part will probably be learning Linux-compatible alternatives for apps that only work on Windows. What kind of programs do you typically use on your Windows system?

    • Lawnman23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most distro’s have a live bootable install. You download a .iso and burn it to a flash drive. Plug it in and boot from it, doesn’t touch or change anything with your current Windows install.

      This lets you try out the OS before fully installing it. Give it a whirl.

      I personally recommend Fedora KDE. https://fedoraproject.org/kde/

      • epicshepich@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Instead of burning the ISO to the flash drive, I recommend burning Ventoy to your flashdrive. Then you can drag and drop ISOs for every distro you want to try without having to burn them every time.

  • SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like linux and I use it (Raspbian, Zorin, Ubuntu, Arch: diff machines). I also enjoy using Win 8.1 on my Lenovo M93p Tiny (8GB ram), as a Playnite appliance / console. This allows me to play emulated games (Wii, Gamecube, PS2, to about 1.5-2x upscale), ~2013ish era AAA titles (Fallout 3, Just Cause 2, Dead Rising 2, GTA IV) and select indy games (like Donut County, Untitled Goose Game, EXO ONE) all from one device.

    Normally, the advice would be to use something like Bazzite or Batocera (and I agree!)…but given the hardware limitations and the “it just runs” nature of these older Window games (under windows) I’ve had better experiences sticking to Win 8.1.

    YMMV but the “switch to linux cause windows too old” thing has some shades of gray.

    • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you play on a machine that is not connected to internet, then by all means there is no reason to switch. But of you are connected to the internet, then those system pose security risks and you would be better off having an up to date system. If Win 10 wasn’t EOL then maybe the advice to upgrade to Win10 would be solid.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Get on Linux anyway. You have no privacy whatsoever on Windows.

    However, if you (like me) have to dual-boot, remember that O&O ShutUp can help you easily turn off Windows’ insidious tracking measures and delete Copilot off your system.

    • Slayer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t recommend dual-boot on the same disk. Windows likes to fuck up the bootmanager with updates every so often so you can’t boot into linux anymore.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you’re still using those old and bugged versions then you probably don’t care about unpatched software. Big security issues. Hope no one is using them.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Microsoft did as well - 8.1 still had ESU support, and as Server 2008 R2 had paid extended support and as it shared a kernel with Vista & 7 you could use those to keep your system updated as well. IIRC both ended January this year.

  • dismay3915@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the main places windows is used, like it or not, are organizations and companies. Especially small ones. Specially ones that are not in wealthy countries. And the only thing that keeps them from switching to linux is microsoft office. (Most importantly Word, excel).

    My company has ~20 people and I would switch them over to linux if it wasn’t for word and excel.

    While libreoffice is great on it’s own, companies send eachother xlsx and docx files. And libreoffice isnt great at reading or writing them. Specially complex ones. I don’t think it’s much of libre office’s fault, but more the shitty incompatible, unstandardized microsoft formats.

    Currently I’m the only Linux user in the team, and I constantly advocate Linux, but I know if anybody switches, compatibility with microsoft office is going to be a problem. I can take the risk with the tech team but not the office section (hr, sales, secretary accounting etc.) really.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is stuff Office 360 or whatever is called to that online Microsoft Office can do just fine from Firefox or Chrome based browsers. But if things get overcomplicated, it’s as good or even worse than Libreoffice at handling xlsx, docx documents.

      Even current Office struggles with early Office documents.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Try onlyoffice and slowly try to shift to libreoffice with open document formats. Or just skip that part and move everyone to the web versions of office. Also if you guys are on office 2010, the last time I ran it via wine, it worked completely fine.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Most browsers, including Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge, have already ended support for Windows 7, 8 and 8.1.”

    To me Millions of flies can’t be wrong: eat shit. is a crappy argument but at least they’re

    “If your current hardware can’t handle Windows 10 or higher for some reason, you can switch to a Linux-based operating system. The vast majority of Linux distributions come with Firefox as the default browser.”

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, it’s a lot of work to make security updates for a browser on an operating system that doesn’t get security updates anymore. Why spend money fixing the weapons on a sinking ship?

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    it was bullshit when they ended support for XP, and now I have to find alternatives on 7!!?

    fuck you Mozilla, you just lost a customer!

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Calm down, XP was 13 years old when it was retired. It lived a long, happy life. And Windows 7 was released seventeen years ago.

      Using either OS in 2026 is extremely dangerous and stupid. Please switch to Linux.

  • MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pretty sure Mozilla has the numbers on how many installations each OS has, so it’s probably a legitimate decision. HOWEVER, if they want to maintain their position on Linux, I highly recommend changing the default behavior of Ctrl+Shift+C to match how it works in Helium, where it simply copies the selected content instead of opening Developer Mode, which cannot be closed again using the same keystroke.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      What’s wrong with Ctrl+C to copy? Its the default shortcut on pretty much everything except terminals.

      • MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Whats wrong with using the metric system to represent quantities? Its the default on pretty much everything except fueling planes or operating satellites. /s

        The conflict arises from having two different defaults for the same action. Since users frequently switch between these environments, the lack of a universal shortcut causes constant friction.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The key issue is that the request is to change behavior in one place (browser) to match that of a rare case (terminal), causing a mismatch with the frequent case (office suites, mail programs, …). The terminal is the odd one out, not the browser, and ought be the one to change the default for the reason you provide.

          In practice, a terminal is a special case and not just a text input window, and current convention is that Ctrl + C aborts / cancels.

          (You could of course have a duplicate hotkey, but now you are inconsistent w.r.t. other browsers, and there will be someone else who will be annoyed by the difference)

          • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Actually, Ctrl+C is the ASCII Code for the control character ETX (End of Text) since the early 60s. This is not a hotkey but a control character. To change this system, you’d have to change not only dozends of terminal emulators and the kernels of all unixoid operating systems, but at least ANSI, Unicode and Posix, too. And Windows, by the way - even Microsoft uses ctrl+c in both cmd.exe and powershell to kill the running process.

            • 8uurg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              To be similarly pedantic: Ctrl+C is a hotkey that sends the corresponding ASCII code / codepoint to signal something, it is not an ASCII code itself.

              You could have the same character be sent by using Ctrl+Q (if you were to remap it), and not break compatibility with other processes while doing so: the codepoint being sent would be the same. From a technological perspective there is nothing special about the key combination Ctrl+C specifically, but altering this behavior in a terminal absolutely wreak havoc on the muscle memory of terminal users, and altering it’s behavior in a text editor on everyone else’s.