It sort of depends on how you define “talks” and “conversation”. If you define them as a communication method of mumbling incoherently to yourself while lackies mop you off after another diaper failure, sure.
Iran has responded that through the press. People in both the US and Iran governments are all saying that no Iranian representative is answering any US call.
What makes “based on the tenor, and tone of those in depth, detailed, and constructive conversations” all the funnier. Also, who the fuck wrote that? It certainly wasn’t Trump.
Which in turn makes the typo even funnier. Did they train it on trump tweets and it learned to include spelling mistakes? Did they decide people wouldn’t believe it was him without errors and swap it in?
He is running for cover alright but the entire “conversations” are completely made up
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/ce35wke27ynt
It sort of depends on how you define “talks” and “conversation”. If you define them as a communication method of mumbling incoherently to yourself while lackies mop you off after another diaper failure, sure.
Negotiations were “We will bomb power infrastructure”. Response: “Here is exact GCC infrastructure we will destroy in response.”
Iran has responded that through the press. People in both the US and Iran governments are all saying that no Iranian representative is answering any US call.
What makes “based on the tenor, and tone of those in depth, detailed, and constructive conversations” all the funnier. Also, who the fuck wrote that? It certainly wasn’t Trump.
They probably
writeslop-up all their press releases before anything has happened and Trump doesn’t know to wait.Which in turn makes the typo even funnier. Did they train it on trump tweets and it learned to include spelling mistakes? Did they decide people wouldn’t believe it was him without errors and swap it in?
Train it!? These people probably don’t even pay for standard services.