In Abilene, about 200 miles west of Dallas, Natura Resources is building the nation’s first advanced liquid-fuel research reactor in nearly 40 years. The project is housed at Abilene Christian University, where a $25 million research facility was completed in September 2023.

Natura has raised $120 million in private funding and received another $120 million from the Legislature.

Natura’s technology uses molten salt as both fuel and coolant — a design last tested at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s. The company is first building a 1-megawatt research reactor in Abilene, intended to demonstrate to regulators and investors that the technology works and is safe.

Aalo Atomics is taking a different approach. The startup, founded by Canadian-born engineer Matt Loszak and based in Austin, is designing a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a technology that uses solid fuel, like conventional nuclear plants, built specifically for factory mass production.

Each unit would produce 10 megawatts, enough to power roughly 6,000 to 7,000 homes in Texas, and the reactors will be sized to fit on a standard truck. Aalo’s commercial model would consist of five of these units, totaling 50 megawatts.

Loszak said the company plans to activate its first 10 megawatt test reactor within about five months, after completing prototype testing at the end of December, as part of its effort to move toward commercial deployment.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Their electrical companies don’t exactly have the best record for maintenance and repairs…

  • user28282912@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is it easier to secure, monitor fewer, bigger reactors or thousands of* small ones? Accidents are still going to happen and I know which scenario makes more sense to me. Especially in light of Trump’s recent push to deregulate nuclear energy, kill the EPA, and pretty much any other kind of sensible management efforts of technology that is great until something goes wrong then it quickly becomes a multi-generational clusterfuck.

    Solar, batteries and long-range transmission infrastructure just makes too much sense I guess.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    How long until they’re driving around with leaking mini reactors in their lifted trucks with their don’t tread on me and blue lives matter stickers?

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Given that small scale nuclear is even less cost effective than GW-scale nuclear it appears a good way to burn investor money.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lol, typical American centric article.

    Just outside Toronto, they’re building four 300MW small modular reactors, at an existing nuclear plant, using proven designs from Hitachi, and the first one is targeted to come online by 2029 or 2030, eclipsing the Texas projects in scale, timeline, and practicality, but that literally doesn’t even get a passing mention.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      4 years to build a power plant is still fucking stupid when you could install 10x the solar and battery capacity in that time.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m sure Texas will do it in the dumbest most unregulated way possible. It will be a good example of what not to do.

    • Nelots@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The website is called The Texas Tribune. They write articles about Texas. I really don’t know why you expected them to mention Canada.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The posted headline is literally “Texas become leading ground for testing small modular reactors”.

        That inherently implies that places that aren’t Texas, are not becoming leading grounds for testing small modular reactors, bringing those other places into the discussion.

        Right now that’s not the headline I’m seeing on the article though, so either they’re A/B testing headlines or OP editorialized.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This should be interesting. Texas can’t even keep its own electric grid functioning all year round.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I know that’s a funny quip and it was true in 2021, but it hasn’t been a problem since that event 5 years ago. Fun fact, Texas is actually the largest producer of wind energy in the nation, and they’re also building out massive solar farms.

      The reason most people don’t hear about it, is it’s being done by the same oil and gas companies that are raking in the money. They’re just diversifying their portfolio so they continue to make money.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        it hasn’t been a problem since that event 5 years ago.

        We’ve been spared any serious natural disasters affecting the grid during that time. No major hurricanes. No big freeze.

        The worst event was the 2024 derecho, and that definitely knocked out power here and there. But it was high enough above the treeline to really wreck infrastructure at the ground level.

        I’ll note that a huge increase in wind and solar capacity means we aren’t exposed to the same kind of economic pressure from five years ago, either. The '21 freeze came, in large part, due to gas power plants locking up when they were needed, because they hadn’t been weatherized. With less acute demand issues (thanks to new green energy) we haven’t been in a position where gas plants could casually wait for prices to spike before turning on.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            And the event led to over 100,000 power outages in the region, most of which came back in a day or two. But that paled beside '21, which took out multiple major metro areas statewide.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    And who will handle the waste product? And who will pay for handling the waste product?

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Given the track record of a lot of projects, they’ll store it on site because actually dealing with it costs money, until it leaks and then they’ll disappear and a bunch of people get horrible diseases and the federal government will spend everyone’s tax dollars to clean it up.

    • felbane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Natura’s research reactor is designed to first prove the LFMSR concept at megawatt scale, then be converted to prove that MSR reactors can reprocess existing nuclear waste as a percentage of its fuel. Which means we could take all of the current stockpile of nuclear waste and re-burn it to the point that it’s 90% consumed (instead of 5% consumed today) and leave a waste product that decays to safe levels extremely quickly (tens of years).

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ll believe it when I see it. This is the state that fracked everything and then spread its radioactive, pfas-infested fracking waste all over the land. Now they’re building elementary schools on top of it.