While the constitution speaks of “separation of powers,” the ‘but equal’ phrasing isn’t uncommon. But you’re correct that the phrase is better (and more accurately) known for the segregationist doctrine.
Right. The phrase being referred to was borrowing from verbiage in the constitution as a push of familiarity and a flowery, feel-good response from those who either never read or never cared what it did.
You’re thinking of checks and balances. Separate but equal was a racist thing.
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/us-v-alvarez/separation-powers-action-us-v-alvarez
While the constitution speaks of “separation of powers,” the ‘but equal’ phrasing isn’t uncommon. But you’re correct that the phrase is better (and more accurately) known for the segregationist doctrine.
Right. The phrase being referred to was borrowing from verbiage in the constitution as a push of familiarity and a flowery, feel-good response from those who either never read or never cared what it did.
Same as ever.