Dont let the narrative turn into “It was about killing a tyrant”. It is about a tyrant distracting us from Epstein and starting a war to cancel the next elections.
There are literally thousands of files that implicate or state that they were involved with epstein, nobody cares. Public is satisfied.
panem et circenses
Including “net” in net positive means that it is more positive than the negatives, so… you’re saying that starting an illegal war of choice with no real longterm plan and bombing children and civilians was worth killing the Iranian supreme leader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it is probably not really what you meant, but it is what the words you typed meant.
For me, currently, it is more positive, yes. Killing iranian tyrant just might allow people to overthrow their current government. As for legality of your war, well as far as world is concerned might makes right. Like at best world leaders will be deeply concerned over american war.
Meh, who cares, death of this cunt is a net positive thing, makes other ones a bit more cautious.
And those 100 school girls?
Dont let the narrative turn into “It was about killing a tyrant”. It is about a tyrant distracting us from Epstein and starting a war to cancel the next elections.
And those school girls are dead, there was no implication that usa is a good guy here, also epstein is the distraction.
I disagree, Epstein files being hidden is what’s protecting the billionaires running the nation, if they are released all their regime will fall
There are literally thousands of files that implicate or state that they were involved with epstein, nobody cares. Public is satisfied. panem et circenses
only a fraction was released, and they redacted the perpetators.
Do you sincerely believe that unredacted names would change anything?
they are the ones afraid of interacting them
Well they certainly believe it otherwise why hide them?
Including “net” in net positive means that it is more positive than the negatives, so… you’re saying that starting an illegal war of choice with no real longterm plan and bombing children and civilians was worth killing the Iranian supreme leader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it is probably not really what you meant, but it is what the words you typed meant.
For me, currently, it is more positive, yes. Killing iranian tyrant just might allow people to overthrow their current government. As for legality of your war, well as far as world is concerned might makes right. Like at best world leaders will be deeply concerned over american war.