But it’s the other way around. The focus point of the artist is the erotic depiction. Can you really blame the artist for making this kind of art with otherwise amusing situations and humor?
That’s the thing with comic strips. They can be self-contained entertainment, but you lose some context nonetheless.
Either the artist desperately needs to get laid OR they desperately need to take a celibacy break. Way too horny for what could be an amusing comic.
The same could be said for lemmy lately. Every other post is horny.
But it’s the other way around. The focus point of the artist is the erotic depiction. Can you really blame the artist for making this kind of art with otherwise amusing situations and humor?
That’s the thing with comic strips. They can be self-contained entertainment, but you lose some context nonetheless.
Horny because she’s playing LoZ in her undies in bed in a single panel?
I don’t think the artist is the horny one here, bruh.
https://jagodibuja.com/
Yeah… no evidence of overtly horny art anywhere else from this artist.
Ooh, at least it’s good art. Seen too many that just don’t put in the effort.
Yeah that’s why you can see undies in the last panel
To be fair, I’ve seen two comics from this artist so far and they’ve both had women in their undies and big ass bazoongas.
And no real humour. I realize it’s in the eye of the beholder, but this stuff is just meh with tiddies.
There is a huge market for meh with titties.
The meh humour cheapens the tiddies.
I prefer bad with tiddies. Bad dialogue is fun.
No, that part is pretty normal. The horny part is being outside with a pants that’s sagging so much you’re practically in your underwear.
Legendary misread