• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      If we have enough deductions to justify itemizing instead of taking the standard deduction.

      I haven’t had a need to itemize in several years.

      That’s not nearly as much of a perk as people make it out to be. It’s good for a couple of years when you’re mostly paying interest, but it’s really not much.

      Remember, a deduction is just removing the expense from your taxable income. It’s not like we get that back from taxes…that’d be a credit.

      So if I pay $5000 in interest over the course of the year, im not getting $5k back on my taxes. We just pretend my gross income is $5k less. And most the time, the standard deduction ends up being more anyway.

      Most W2 workers take standard deduction. You aren’t missing anything.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Itemizing stopped being beneficial for me when they capped the mortgage interest deduction at $10K.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        My primary income is W2, but I have a 1099 side gig (teaching scuba and underwater photography at a university) that usually results in me itemizing mostly because my gear is stupid expensive and I rarely make an actual profit. The write-offs are enough to let me justify spending the money on the gear to help me break even while teaching.

        I do multi-year write-offs on the big-ticket items, because one underwater camera rig (camera, housing, strobes, wet-lenses, etc) costs what I make teaching underwater photography across 4-6 semesters.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think the last time I itemized was when I was doing some 1099 work, plus changed jobs, changed employment state, sold a house in one state and bought one in another.

          It was a complicated tax year.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s by design, and in theory meant to encourage ownership to put personal stakes in the region. In practice, of course, homes are laughably unaffordable and it’s a free bonus for the rich.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was surprised to see this stat: homeownership in the US is in the mid to high 60%s range. Meaning we have twice as many owner-occupied homes as rented homes.

        Now everyone please proceed to downvote this sourced fact, offered without even any commentary.