• Didntdoit71@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    Elon Musk is a plague upon the human condition. Our best hope in the US, right now, is that a Starship launch goes horribly right and hits the White House during a cabinet meeting with Elmo as a a guest. Burn it black…pave over it and start over. Preferably after a mandatory prison-raping of all billionaires, especially those who loved Epstein. Fuck em all…let god sort em out.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is how the night sky looks right now:

    It’s crazy to think that all this will be privately owned by ultra rich techno-fascists that are beyond any democratic control.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If this actually happens, I will dedicate my life to getting the funding to create a laser weapon that can shoot them out of the sky from Earth.

    Then we’ll play Space Invaders for keeps.

  • pharceface@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Rather than just run some fucking cable like we already have for the grid. It’s determined that we should put a bunch of future space junk into our atmosphere. Even more frustrating is that we can’t recover anything from them, all the resources being wasted on something we can’t even recycle.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If we can find a way to destroy ONE (or very few) in a catastrophic enough way, it should cascade and destroy everything at the same altitude.

    If I knew how, I would gladly take the possible lifelong prison sentence. I could never feel bad again after such an achievement x)

  • uenticx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Their CIDR ranges are also fucking ripe with hacked devices and criminals. 98% of connections from their 153./8 are all fucking bots.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      What 153./8? You mean the allocated 153.66.0.0/15? But yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised, they probably don’t care about abuse reports and it’s more difficult to pinpoint a specific customer due to CGNAT.

      At least they provide a nice list of ranges you could block.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Don’t fall for the clickbait reporting here. Musk has a history of making comically exaggerated claims. There won’t be a million satellites just like there wasn’t a 4000 km/h train, self-driving tunnel network, intercontinental rocket transport or Mars colony.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Literally nearly ever claim and promise from Elmo has been a lie so far, no idea why anyone believes this conman

      He literally is a billionaire because he lies. Literally.

      He is incompetent as fuck, he’s a drug junkie, yet still there are so many people who look up to this shit stain

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      But there will be more satellites, and not just from SpaceX. They are already disturbing astronomers work, and it will only get worse.

      There was no real debate about whether the world population is ok with it. Big corp has money, big corp acts for its interest and nothing else.

      And I’m not denying the benefits of low-orbit satellites and having vast but lowly populated areas at last getting access to a fast Internet. I’m jùst pointing out that this whole thing is happening mostly out of control (or very very few control).

      If you add that now international laws was shot and its body discarded in the toilet, also note that getting too much dependent on these satellites makes you very vulnerable to a military strike. I have no doubt that Russia, China and other countries (Iran?) are actively working on satellites destruction, with or without creating debris and giving us a Kessler syndrom. If you look at climate change, on-going life mass extinction, water scarcity, etc. there is little doubt that world leaders will make the worst possible decisions in the name of pragmatism (or religion, but it doesn’t really matter).

      • ZMoney@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The problem is that we offloaded “world leadership” to a bunch of ultra-rich sociopaths who only care about their own profit maximization. And they then made actual profit obsolete, since the only product they produce now is hype in the service of inflationary speculative assets. From a planetary perspective it looks like the human species is committing suicide.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Humanity is a self - resolving virus on this planet. Give it time and we’ll all be dead due to our own stupidity and nature will get back to where it should be.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Of all the permanent and irreparable things big corporations are doing to our world, I struggle to really put this high up. Yeah it sucks, but it provides a useful service and they naturally degrade. If anything Im more worried about all the pollution from them burning up in the atmosphere. If they stop launching them, the sky will be clear within the deccade.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Now I’m curious. Can a satellite fly over a country without permission? I know that an aircraft can’t. How far up from the Earth’s surface does sovereignity end?

  • bcgm3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    List of Starlink and Starshield Launches - Wikipedia

    ~10,000 Satellites currently orbiting right now, and that’s just Starlink.

    Check out the list of launches under “Falcon 9 Launches > Starlink Launches.” It’s every other day now (sometimes consecutive days) that they launch another rocket, and each payload is carrying 20 to 60 satellites.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If you assume each one is only starlink and they always send the max and no losses, it would take 90 years to get 1 million.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Starlink is 2/3rds of all satellites. They add 5-6 per day, lose one per day.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I was a space kid, followed every space shot since 1965, was a super fan of Apollo 11, I had a subscription to Nat Geo growing up, just for the Space photos.

    So I can’t believe I’m saying this: Maybe we’ve gone far enough for now, and we should have a moratorium on space for the next 50 years.

    We should concentrate on Earth for awhile, dontcha think?

    • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This isn’t really space science related, just commercialization. And about focusing on Earth: we should let scientists work on what they’re passionate about, IMO they’ll be more motivated to research their field of choice

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        we should let scientists work on what they’re passionate about

        *fund them

        Why is it always 100x more on useless destruction and military? And yeah i know the sad answer already.

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        SpaceX has developed laundry list of new technology to enable Starlink and other endeavors. It’s silly to discount that as worthless.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            AND makes life far worse for literally the entire planet.

            Imagine unilaterally deciding that increasing your already obscene fortune is more important than every living creature that will ever exist in the future having a sky to enjoy, ever again. To these people, human joy is not something worth preserving.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          lol just so you know a “laundry list” is a list of bad things.

          And no, rockets that can put stuff into orbit where around even before Mama Musk shat out lil Mech-Hitler.

          • cole@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Not like these ones. I’m almost tired of having this discussion y’all are blinded by hatred.

            First full flow staged combustion engine, dramatically lower launch prices than competitors (cheaper for the government and has enabled more interesting things to go to space), dramatically more access (SpaceX flies multiple times a week!), booster recovery & rocket reuse.

            And again I know everyone really is blinded by their seething rage but starship is going to change the whole landscape again.

            You can hate the man as much as you want, I’m not saying I don’t. But you discredit yourself by not knowing what SpaceX is actually doing.

            I mean, we still wouldn’t have US access to space without SpaceX (Boeing fiasco…).

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I dunno, every engineer not working on space almost certainly ends up optimizing some sort of ad delivery system. The tech industry is almost completely enshittified.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That’s great, but that comes from funding those things, not shutting down a different industry. It’d be better to shut down non-productive industries like bombing brown kids in the Middle East.

        • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          A lot of the ultra wealthy espouse a nonsense philosophy called “Effective Altruism”, which asserts a kind of utilitarian “most good for the most people” ethic, but in such a way that one can basically justify any action as being, eventually, for the most good ¯_(ツ)_/¯

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Including being good to hypothetical, unlikely trillions that may live someday if we colonize Mars.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve been really passionate about space. My bday is on the anniversary of the moon landing, and my one aunt has always reminded me of the fact. My great grandfather worked for NASA and my aunt gave me his stargazing binoculars that his brother gave him when he got hired at NASA. That part of my family instilled a huge love of science in me, esp space stuff. I wanna go to space more than anything, but I don’t have the brains or constitution to be an astronaut. So I just daydream, stargaze, and write poems about the cosmos.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Believe it or not, you can do two things at once. Some people are interested in space, some in geology. That’s fine.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Right. Elon hires people on the basis they’ll be making Mars travel possible, but that Starship is really for dumping metal all over the night sky.

      • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It has always applied to LEO. Scifi media transformed it into the idea of “nothing will ever be able to leave the planet ever again” but the original studies that the phrase originated from included LEO. Despite the fact that there is enough atmosphere that a lot of the debris would experience sufficient drag for their orbits to decay within several years, not decades or millenia, it would still have huge impacts.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes it does because parts of LEO have such low air resistance that the junk will stay up there for a very long time. However, I think part of how the Starlink satellites work is being so low that they do deorbit pretty quickly.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Elon Musk is such a goddamned literal supervillain that he managed to make the theme of Firefly wrong.

    Apparently, they can take the sky from you.